Share via


Disable copy permission

Question

Monday, February 21, 2011 11:51 AM

Hi I have Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition on server and Win7/WinXP on client Side

I want to set the permission in such a way that I share a folder with some files in it on the network.

I want that User can read/Write on that folder but cannot CUT/COPY from it. As we have very important 

Data and we want that user can only view and write in it but cannot copy/Cut it. Is there any Cumulative 

share and NTFS resultant permissions which can solve my issue?

All replies (4)

Monday, February 21, 2011 1:30 PM âś…Answered

This is not possible. 'Read' implies 'copy'.

The only possible way I see is to access that data in Terminal Server, which has client redirection and clipboard disabled. But still, users will be able to take display photos with their mobile phones.

MCITP: Enterprise Administrator; MCT; Microsoft Security Trusted Advisor; CCNA


Monday, February 21, 2011 2:05 PM

This is not possible in Windows (unfortunatelly). When you grant user "Read" permission, then copying is possible. You can always enable Folders/Files auditing and review log to check who copied data and when to track this issue.

How to implement folders/files auditing

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc757864(WS.10).aspx

Regards, Krzysztof


Tuesday, February 22, 2011 3:10 AM

Hi,

 

Agree with WindowsNT.LV and Krzysztof that if the users have Read permission, they can copy and there is nothing you can do using standard NTFS or Share permissions.

 

However, if the folder is on NTFS drive, you can set auditing to record who has copied the folder. For more information, please refer to:

 

Configuring Audit Policies

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd277403.aspx

 

File and Folder Permissions

http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb727008.aspx

 

Hope it helps.

 

Regards,

Bruce

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. Please remember to click "Mark as Answer" on the post that helps you, and to click "Unmark as Answer" if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.


Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:14 PM

I'm pretty sure that auditing won't be any useful. Just imagine yourself analyzing TONS of Read Successes. None of automation tricks would help either.MCITP: Enterprise Administrator; MCT; Microsoft Security Trusted Advisor; CCNA