An Azure managed PostgreSQL database service for app development and deployment.
Hi @megamingus ,
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
Based on the troubleshooting completed, this appears to be a resource-level diagnostic export issue, rather than a PostgreSQL engine, Log Analytics capacity, or destination-specific problem.
The main indicators are
All diagnostic categories stopped exporting within the same time window.
The PostgreSQL Flexible Server remains healthy and continues generating activity.
Deleting and recreating the diagnostic setting did not restore the export.
Restarting the server had no effect.
A separate diagnostic setting targeting an Azure Storage account also received no data.
The Log Analytics workspace shows no quota, throttling, or ingestion-related events.
Because both Log Analytics and Storage destinations are affected, the failure appears to occur before the logs reach either destination.
- Can the customer inspect or reset the export pipeline
There is no documented customer-facing mechanism to inspect, restart, or reset the underlying diagnostic export pipeline for an individual PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
Recreating the diagnostic setting is the appropriate customer-side action. Since this has already been completed without restoring the export, Microsoft Support will need to investigate the backend state.
- Should compute scaling be used as a workaround
A compute scale operation is not a documented or guaranteed remediation for diagnostic export failures. Scaling a production server solely to restore logging is not recommended, particularly before Support has reviewed the existing failure state.
- Can Microsoft restore the export
Microsoft Support can investigate the resource-level diagnostic routing state and engage the appropriate Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Monitor engineering teams if backend remediation is required.
The support request should include:
Subscription ID and server resource ID
Region: West Europe
Failure window: 24 August 2026, approximately 08:43–08:57 UTC
Diagnostic-setting configuration and resource ID
Log Analytics workspace and Storage account details
Last ingestion time for each affected table
Results of the diagnostic-setting recreation and server restart
Relevant Activity Log, Resource Health, and Service Health results
- Can the missing logs be recovered
Logs that were not delivered to Log Analytics or Storage should not be assumed to be recoverable or replayable.
As an immediate step, check PostgreSQL Flexible Server → Monitoring → Server logs. PostgreSQL server log files may still be available for download if they remain within the configured retention period. However, this would not necessarily recover other categories such as Query Store Runtime, session statistics, autovacuum statistics, or PgBouncer logs.
For reference:
Configure and access logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Diagnostic settings in Azure Monitor
In summary, the available evidence isolates the failure to the diagnostic export path for this resource. There is no documented customer-side reset, compute scaling is not a supported recovery method, and recovery of logs that were not exported cannot be guaranteed. The recommended next step is to open an Azure Support request for backend investigation and avoid further disruptive changes until the current state has been reviewed.
I hope this helps. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
If this answer helps, please consider clicking Accept Answer so that other community members facing similar issues can benefit from it as well.Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
Based on the troubleshooting completed, this appears to be a resource-level diagnostic export issue, rather than a PostgreSQL engine, Log Analytics capacity, or destination-specific problem.
The main indicators are:
All diagnostic categories stopped exporting within the same time window.
The PostgreSQL Flexible Server remains healthy and continues generating activity.
Deleting and recreating the diagnostic setting did not restore the export.
Restarting the server had no effect.
A separate diagnostic setting targeting an Azure Storage account also received no data.
The Log Analytics workspace shows no quota, throttling, or ingestion-related events.
Because both Log Analytics and Storage destinations are affected, the failure appears to occur before the logs reach either destination.
- Can the customer inspect or reset the export pipeline
There is no documented customer-facing mechanism to inspect, restart, or reset the underlying diagnostic export pipeline for an individual PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
Recreating the diagnostic setting is the appropriate customer-side action. Since this has already been completed without restoring the export, Microsoft Support will need to investigate the backend state.
- Should compute scaling be used as a workaround
A compute scale operation is not a documented or guaranteed remediation for diagnostic export failures. Scaling a production server solely to restore logging is not recommended, particularly before Support has reviewed the existing failure state.
- Can Microsoft restore the export
Microsoft Support can investigate the resource-level diagnostic routing state and engage the appropriate Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Monitor engineering teams if backend remediation is required.
The support request should include:
Subscription ID and server resource ID
Region: West Europe
Failure window: 24 August 2026, approximately 08:43–08:57 UTC
Diagnostic-setting configuration and resource ID
Log Analytics workspace and Storage account details
Last ingestion time for each affected table
Results of the diagnostic-setting recreation and server restart
Relevant Activity Log, Resource Health, and Service Health results
- Can the missing logs be recovered
Logs that were not delivered to Log Analytics or Storage should not be assumed to be recoverable or replayable.
As an immediate step, check PostgreSQL Flexible Server → Monitoring → Server logs. PostgreSQL server log files may still be available for download if they remain within the configured retention period. However, this would not necessarily recover other categories such as Query Store Runtime, session statistics, autovacuum statistics, or PgBouncer logs.
For reference:
Configure and access logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Diagnostic settings in Azure Monitor
In summary, the available evidence isolates the failure to the diagnostic export path for this resource. There is no documented customer-side reset, compute scaling is not a supported recovery method, and recovery of logs that were not exported cannot be guaranteed. The recommended next step is to open an Azure Support request for backend investigation and avoid further disruptive changes until the current state has been reviewed.
I hope this helps. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
If this answer helps, please consider clicking Accept Answer so that other community members facing similar issues can benefit from it as well.Hi @megamingus ,
Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
Based on the troubleshooting completed, this appears to be a resource-level diagnostic export issue, rather than a PostgreSQL engine, Log Analytics capacity, or destination-specific problem.
The main indicators are
All diagnostic categories stopped exporting within the same time window.
The PostgreSQL Flexible Server remains healthy and continues generating activity.
Deleting and recreating the diagnostic setting did not restore the export.
Restarting the server had no effect.
A separate diagnostic setting targeting an Azure Storage account also received no data.
The Log Analytics workspace shows no quota, throttling, or ingestion-related events.
Because both Log Analytics and Storage destinations are affected, the failure appears to occur before the logs reach either destination.
- Can the customer inspect or reset the export pipeline
There is no documented customer-facing mechanism to inspect, restart, or reset the underlying diagnostic export pipeline for an individual PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
Recreating the diagnostic setting is the appropriate customer-side action. Since this has already been completed without restoring the export, Microsoft Support will need to investigate the backend state.
- Should compute scaling be used as a workaround
A compute scale operation is not a documented or guaranteed remediation for diagnostic export failures. Scaling a production server solely to restore logging is not recommended, particularly before Support has reviewed the existing failure state.
- Can Microsoft restore the export
Microsoft Support can investigate the resource-level diagnostic routing state and engage the appropriate Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Monitor engineering teams if backend remediation is required.
The support request should include:
Subscription ID and server resource ID
Region: West Europe
Failure window: 24 August 2026, approximately 08:43–08:57 UTC
Diagnostic-setting configuration and resource ID
Log Analytics workspace and Storage account details
Last ingestion time for each affected table
Results of the diagnostic-setting recreation and server restart
Relevant Activity Log, Resource Health, and Service Health results
- Can the missing logs be recovered
Logs that were not delivered to Log Analytics or Storage should not be assumed to be recoverable or replayable.
As an immediate step, check PostgreSQL Flexible Server → Monitoring → Server logs. PostgreSQL server log files may still be available for download if they remain within the configured retention period. However, this would not necessarily recover other categories such as Query Store Runtime, session statistics, autovacuum statistics, or PgBouncer logs.
For reference:
Configure and access logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Diagnostic settings in Azure Monitor
In summary, the available evidence isolates the failure to the diagnostic export path for this resource. There is no documented customer-side reset, compute scaling is not a supported recovery method, and recovery of logs that were not exported cannot be guaranteed. The recommended next step is to open an Azure Support request for backend investigation and avoid further disruptive changes until the current state has been reviewed.
I hope this helps. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
If this answer helps, please consider clicking Accept Answer so that other community members facing similar issues can benefit from it as well.Thank you for reaching out to Microsoft Q&A.
Based on the troubleshooting completed, this appears to be a resource-level diagnostic export issue, rather than a PostgreSQL engine, Log Analytics capacity, or destination-specific problem.
The main indicators are:
All diagnostic categories stopped exporting within the same time window.
The PostgreSQL Flexible Server remains healthy and continues generating activity.
Deleting and recreating the diagnostic setting did not restore the export.
Restarting the server had no effect.
A separate diagnostic setting targeting an Azure Storage account also received no data.
The Log Analytics workspace shows no quota, throttling, or ingestion-related events.
Because both Log Analytics and Storage destinations are affected, the failure appears to occur before the logs reach either destination.
- Can the customer inspect or reset the export pipeline
There is no documented customer-facing mechanism to inspect, restart, or reset the underlying diagnostic export pipeline for an individual PostgreSQL Flexible Server.
Recreating the diagnostic setting is the appropriate customer-side action. Since this has already been completed without restoring the export, Microsoft Support will need to investigate the backend state.
- Should compute scaling be used as a workaround
A compute scale operation is not a documented or guaranteed remediation for diagnostic export failures. Scaling a production server solely to restore logging is not recommended, particularly before Support has reviewed the existing failure state.
- Can Microsoft restore the export
Microsoft Support can investigate the resource-level diagnostic routing state and engage the appropriate Azure Database for PostgreSQL and Azure Monitor engineering teams if backend remediation is required.
The support request should include:
Subscription ID and server resource ID
Region: West Europe
Failure window: 24 August 2026, approximately 08:43–08:57 UTC
Diagnostic-setting configuration and resource ID
Log Analytics workspace and Storage account details
Last ingestion time for each affected table
Results of the diagnostic-setting recreation and server restart
Relevant Activity Log, Resource Health, and Service Health results
- Can the missing logs be recovered
Logs that were not delivered to Log Analytics or Storage should not be assumed to be recoverable or replayable.
As an immediate step, check PostgreSQL Flexible Server → Monitoring → Server logs. PostgreSQL server log files may still be available for download if they remain within the configured retention period. However, this would not necessarily recover other categories such as Query Store Runtime, session statistics, autovacuum statistics, or PgBouncer logs.
For reference:
Configure and access logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Logs in Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server
Diagnostic settings in Azure Monitor
In summary, the available evidence isolates the failure to the diagnostic export path for this resource. There is no documented customer-side reset, compute scaling is not a supported recovery method, and recovery of logs that were not exported cannot be guaranteed. The recommended next step is to open an Azure Support request for backend investigation and avoid further disruptive changes until the current state has been reviewed.
I hope this helps. Please let us know if you have any further questions.
If this answer helps, please consider clicking Accept Answer so that other community members facing similar issues can benefit from it as well.