Hello @Rossia Luca
Based on the symptoms, I would focus on the upstream switch MAC-learning behavior rather than Event ID 113 or a Windows update. If outbound traffic works but return traffic disappears once the switch MAC table reaches its limit, that strongly suggests the physical switching layer is no longer learning or forwarding the VM MAC addresses correctly.
For SET, Windows supports both Dynamic and HyperVPort load-balancing algorithms, and you can explicitly change an existing SET switch to Hyper-V Port mode:
Get-VMSwitchTeam -Name "YourSETvSwitch"
Set-VMSwitchTeam -Name "YourSETvSwitch" `
-LoadBalancingAlgorithm HyperVPort
Microsoft's current Hyper-V cluster networking guidance recommends Switch Independent teaming with Hyper-V Port load balancing for clustered Hyper-V deployments. Hyper-V Port associates a VM's virtual NIC/MAC with a particular physical team member, which can also make MAC learning more predictable for the upstream switches.
I would therefore test HyperVPort and simultaneously check the physical switches for:
- MAC-address-table capacity or per-port MAC limits.
- Port-security/maximum learned MAC settings.
- MAC flapping between SET uplinks.
- Whether the affected VM MAC is learned on the expected physical port.
- VLAN/trunk configuration consistency across every SET member.
If connectivity becomes stable immediately after switching from Dynamic to HyperVPort, that would strongly point toward an interaction with upstream MAC learning rather than a guest or vSwitch failure.
I wouldn't assume a Windows hotfix is required based on the information provided. The fact that the upstream MAC table is reaching its configured limit needs to be addressed as well; changing the SET algorithm shouldn't be treated as a substitute for correcting an undersized or restrictive MAC-learning configuration.
Please "Accept the Answer" if this information helped you. This will help us and others in the community as well.