A family of Microsoft relational database management systems designed for ease of use.
Please understand that our forum is a public platform, and we will modify your question to cover the personal information in the description. Kindly ensure that you hide these personal or organization information next time you post error or some information to protect personal data.
Dear @Ken Wykoff,
Welcome to Microsoft Q&A Forum!
Based on your description, I would like to clarify this situation for you to have more insights: the behavior you’re seeing is expected when using the classic Microsoft TreeView Control (MSComCTL.OCX) in modern 64‑bit Office / Microsoft 365 Access. The TreeView control is part of the old VB6 “Microsoft Windows Common Controls” (MSComCTL.OCX) library. This control was designed only for 32‑bit Office, and native 64‑bit Office cannot load 32‑bit ActiveX components.
Microsoft states this clearly in this official compatibility documentation (the Q&A Assists also mentioned it): Compatibility between the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of Office
Therefore, this is why, in Microsoft 365 Access (especially the 64‑bit edition), you see the message “ActiveX control not supported.”
In this case, I really want to help you, so I have tried my best to find any replacements for ActiveX control, but Microsoft does not provide a modern TreeView replacement control. However, I also found that Microsoft does support modern UI design patterns without ActiveX, including:
1.Navigation Forms (official Microsoft feature):
Navigation Forms are fully supported in Microsoft 365 Access and provide a structured way to build hierarchical navigation without ActiveX. Reference: Video: Create navigation forms
2.Form and Subform Hierarchical designs:
You can build expandable, multi-level UIs using native Access objects:
- Main form (Category list)
- Subform (Child items)
- Additional nested subforms if deeper structure is required
These are secure, and require no external controls.
Please see more details about it in here: Create a form that contains a subform (a one-to-many form)
I hope this information can give you some insights about this situation and please feel free to update to me in comment section. Wish you a good day!
Note: Please follow the steps in our documentation to enable e-mail notifications if you want to receive the related email notification for this thread.